Common Ground, Complex Problems and Decision Making
نویسنده
چکیده
Organisations increasingly have to deal with complex problems. They often use multidisciplinary teams to cope with such problems where different team members have different perspectives on the problem, different individual knowledge and skills, and different approaches on how to solve the problem. In order to solve those problems, team members have to share their existing knowledge and construct new knowledge. Theory suggests that negotiation of common ground can positively affect team decision making on the solution of complex problems, by facilitating knowledge sharing across perspectives. In a small scale study with student groups, external representations supported by a specific negotiation ontology were used to facilitate negotiation by encouraging participants to make their beliefs and values explicit. Results showed that the external representations supported clarifying contributions to group members and increased group participation in discussions.
منابع مشابه
Extensions of ELECTRE-I and TOPSIS methods for group decision-making under complex Pythagorean fuzzy environment
Multi-criteria group decision-making is a process in which decision makers assess the performance of alternatives on the basis of conflicting criteria to opt the most worthy alternative as solution. TOPSIS and ELECTRE are effective and commonly used methods to solve multiple criteria decision-making problems. The aim of this study is to propose two new models, namely, complex Pythagorean fuzzy ...
متن کاملCollaborative Visual Analytics: A Health Analytics Approach to Injury Prevention
Background: Accurate understanding of complex health data is critical in order to deal with wicked health problems and make timely decisions. Wicked problems refer to ill-structured and dynamic problems that combine multidimensional elements, which often preclude the conventional problem solving approach. This pilot study introduces visual analytics (VA) methods to multi-stakeholder decision-ma...
متن کاملProviding marketing strategies based on the model and indicators of international life style and type of consumer decision making-case study : Consumers of cosmetic products.
This study aimed to provide marketing strategies based on the model and indicators of international life style and types of purchase decision making. Methodology of the research is descriptive-survey and it targeted to be applied research. Data were collected by both primary and secondary styles. Considering krejcie and Morgan’s table, statistical sample included 384 questionnaires for unlimite...
متن کاملApplying Pretopological Concepts & Negotiation Analysis to Study Cockpit’s Perspective to Collaborative Decision Making
Objective: This research is designed to present a methodological approach for problems encountered with cockpits perspective to collaborate decision making in order to support the Air Transport Management (ATM) with simulation software development and system behaviour simulation. Background: Collaborative decision making (CDM) is a means to challenge punctuality and reliability issues at conges...
متن کاملExclusionary Decision Making in Tehran Metropolitan Region- Complexity, Self organization and Power of Action
Viewing urban areas as webs of complex, interwoven networks, this article aims to analyze the decision-making process and its outcomes in Tehran metropolitan region. To do so, first the theoretical basis of complexity in urban life and its implications for planning have been reviewed. Using the main notion of power of action i.e. agency, and through creating the network of actors and their rela...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2006